top of page

Victor Thruster Ryuga 3 Badminton Racket Review: A Genuine Step Forward For The Ryuga Line

5 hours ago
7 min read

Victor has been putting out Thruster Ryuga rackets for years now - this Thruster Ryuga 3 is essentially the fifth generation of the Ryuga bloodline, but it's the one that actually feels like a proper step forward. Here's the full breakdown: design, specs, new technology, and most importantly, how it actually plays!


This review is part of a wider look at the Ryuga line. A full comparison covering all five generations is coming soon - but for now, the focus is on Ryuga 3!


Here are the 5 generations of Ryuga:




Victor Thruster Ryuga 3: Aesthetics & Design


Victor did something genuinely nice here! The finish is a predominantly pink and magenta colourway - one of the best-looking Ryugas yet.



At the T-joint, Victor split the branding: one side carries the Victor logo, the other the Ryuga logo - a small but effective touch of sub-line identity!


But the standout detail is definitely the butt cap's 3D effect. Tilt it one way and you see the Victor logo, tilt it the other and it morphs into the Ryuga logo!



Is it a little gimmicky? Sure. Is it a genuinely lovely detail? Absolutely. It's a small thing, but it signals a level of attention to detail that wasn't expected.





Victor Thruster Ryuga 3: New Technology


Two headline updates sit under the hood of the Ryuga 3.


  1. Dynamic Box Frame


The twisted frame style running from the 4 o'clock to the 8 o'clock region is reminiscent of the original Drive X 9's Dynamic Hex frame. The Dynamic Box appears to be a direct evolution of that concept.


  1. Free Core 2.0 Handle 

Victor Thruster Ryuga 3 Free Core Handle 2.0
Victor Thruster Ryuga 3

This is Victor's second generation of their proprietary non-wood, plastic handle technology. Free Core handles generally make rackets easier and more enjoyable to play with, but they've historically come with trade-offs: a softer, more damped feel, and in extreme cases, a loss of torsional stiffness that makes the handle feel "twisty."


Traditionally, when Victor wanted a stiffer, crisper response, they'd pair a racket with a wooden handle instead, and out of the five Ryuga models released so far, only the Ryuga 2 and Ryuga 2 Pro used Free Core handles, feeling noticeably different from their wooden-handled siblings as a result.


The Free Core 2.0 in this Ryuga 3 is designed to address those historical weaknesses with a more solid feel and improved performance, and it genuinely surprised me in testing (more on that below)!





Victor Thruster Ryuga 3: Specifications Breakdown


The tester model is a 4U G5 spec racket, rated for string tension up to 32 lbs on the 4U frame. For testing consistency, it was strung with my usual setup of  Yonex Aerobite (UK here, US here) at 27 lbs x 29 lbs.


Specification

Measurement

Shaft Diameter

6.8 mm

Shaft Length

21.5 cm

Frame Thickness

9.9 mm

Frame Height

23.6 cm

Frame Width

18.3 cm

Recessed Frame

Top half only

Handle Length

17.5 cm


Nothing too radical on paper, and the specs are fairly close to the Ryuga 2 - though this is the thinnest shaft in the lineup so far. That recessed top-half frame, combined with the Dynamic Box frame shape, is doing some aerodynamic work worth watching for on court.




Remember to protect your precious badminton rackets from chips and scratches with the Premium Racket Protection Tape with free delivery worldwide on ckyew.com/shop. We also have some super limited edition player signed prints too!
Premium Racket Protection Tape
Buy Now




Victor Thruster Ryuga 3: Swingweight Data


I tested the racket on the swingweight machine across a few different grip configurations:

Grip Setup

Left (g)

Right (g)

Total Weight (g)

Balance (mm)

Swingweight (kg/cm²)

Performance SW

Free Core 2 only

20.5

22.4

81.2

331

90.5

89.8

Free Core 2 + 1 grip

21.3

21.0

86.6

315

92.0

92.4

Free Core 2 + 2 grips

20.9

20.8

90.9

303

92.5

94.0


A few things stand out immediately:

  • A balance point of 331mm on the bare handle makes it genuinely head-heavy, and the highest balance point number recorded from a Victor racket so far. That said, this figure is on the bare Free Core handle only.

  • Adding one layer of grip brings this balance point down to 315mm.

  • And even after adding grips and bringing balance down to 303mm, the swingweight number barely moves - a sign the head is carrying real mass, not just shifting due to grip weight!

  • Compared to the Ryuga Metallic, this Ryuga 3 comes out ahead on some swingweight numbers, meaning it should be less demanding to play - a good sign for a lot of players.


Just know this: it's still a very head-heavy frame!




Victor Thruster Ryuga 3: On-Court Performance


Empty Racket Feel


This racket is very head-heavy! There's no way around it, and it's especially noticeable across a longer session. Active effort is needed to keep the racket up between shots, otherwise the head weight can create a sluggish feeling in reaction to certain shots and lead to more timing errors.

Victor Thruster Ryuga 3 badminton racket
Victor Thruster Ryuga 3

Power


There's definitely plenty of power. That head weight translates directly into effortless power, and smashes carry real weight once you're swinging through properly.


Stiffness


This was the genuine surprise of this racket. The handle feels stiffer than typically expected from a Free Core handle. Normally that dampened, slightly less "crisp" feedback is the trade-off. This one bucks that trend, feeling more responsive, crisp, and genuinely lovely to hit through.


Victor has clearly refined the Free Core concept with this 2.0 version, and the benefit shows up in accuracy too. Shots felt cleanly guided to wherever intended, without the occasional torsional twist that came with the original Free Core handles.


Sweet Spot


The sweet spot on the Ryuga 3 is massive, and not just in size but it's genuinely responsive too. Testing every racket with the same string and tension makes it possible to properly assess this kind of thing racket to racket, and the Ryuga 3's sweet spot stood out clearly.


Even slightly off-centre hits still get guided reasonably well rather than requiring the shuttle to be muscled through. Miss it completely, though, and it will still punish you!


Control


Despite being head-heavy, control is genuinely present. This isn't a mindless sledgehammer - shots can be shaped and placed as needed, and the racket executes.





Victor Thruster Ryuga 3: Who Is This For?


Victor Thruster Ryuga 3 badminton racket
Victor Thruster Ryuga 3

Singles Players 


For singles players, the Ryuga 3 is an absolute fit. The head weight and power profile suit the longer rallies and full-court swings that singles demands.


Doubles Players


For doubles players, the Ryuga 3 is a harder sell. The head-heaviness makes fast-paced flat exchanges tougher to keep up with, and defence becomes noticeably more sluggish. Not a recommended pick for doubles for me personally!


Worth Noting On Weight Class


The 3U version of this racket isn't something to look forward to lightly. If the 4U already swings this heavy, 3U is an entirely different beast. The 4U is genuinely the more adequate choice for power and control for most players so anyone considering the 3U for extra mass should be mindful of injury risk, particularly across longer sessions.



Final Verdict


Victor Thruster Ryuga 3 badminton racket
Victor Thruster Ryuga 3

Victor is clearly taking the Ryuga line in a good direction with this one, making it more playable and accessible without stripping away the control, feel, and power the line is known for. The Thruster Ryuga 3 finds a genuinely nice middle ground: powerful, head-heavy, but paired with a sweet spot and responsiveness that make it enjoyable to play with, not just powerful to swing.


And that butt cap detail keeps coming to mind - a small, slightly gimmicky touch, but one that signals Victor cared about the whole package here, not just what's happening inside the frame.


Overall, this is a genuinely impressive racket. Finding a head-heavy racket that isn't a complete sledgehammer has historically been a struggle to recommend confidently.


Victor already has excellent even-balanced and head-light options in the Drive X 12 and several Auraspeed models. The Thruster Ryuga 3 now earns a place on that same list of genuine recommendations. Not a pure sledgehammer, but one with more than enough power for players who like head-heavy setups.


Overall, if you're a singles player who wants power without sacrificing feel, this one's a no-brainer and absolutely worth trying!


If you're curious how the Thruster Ryuga 3 stacks up against the older Ryuga generations - a full five-way comparison is coming soon! Until then, let me know in the comments what you'd like covered, don't forget to use my code "CKYEW" for extra discounts, and I'll see you in the next one!



FAQ: Victor Thruster Ryuga 3


Is the Victor Thruster Ryuga 3 head-heavy? Yes, it's one of the most head-heavy rackets tested, with a bare-handle balance point of 331mm. Even with grips added, the swingweight stays high, confirming genuine mass in the head rather than just a shifted balance point.


What handle does the Thruster Ryuga 3 use? Victor's Free Core 2.0 - their second-generation non-wood, plastic handle technology, designed to address the softer, less torsionally stiff feel of the original Free Core handles used on the Ryuga 2 and Ryuga 2 Pro.


Is the Thruster Ryuga 3 good for doubles? Not particularly recommended. The head-heaviness makes fast, flat doubles exchanges and quick defensive resets harder to manage compared to a lighter or more even-balanced frame.


Is the Victor Thruster Ryuga 3 better than the Ryuga Metallic? On recorded swingweight data, the Ryuga 3 comes out less demanding than the Ryuga Metallic in some configurations, suggesting an easier-to-handle profile while retaining strong power output.


Should I get the 3U or 4U version of the Thruster Ryuga 3? The 4U is the recommended choice for most players, offering plenty of power and control without the added swing demands and injury risk that a heavier 3U version would bring.




Comments


bottom of page